Choosing Safe Menstrual Products

The only obligations required of menstrual product manufacturers are that they provide basic instructional labeling on their packaging and keep records of adverse events caused by their product.

There is still no requirement for testing or for labeling and detailed disclosure of product ingredients on packaging.

History

  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is responsible for approving and disclosing the ingredients in menstrual products. Originally classified as cosmetics with little to no labeling, this changed in 1976 with the Medical Device Amendments

  • It was at this time that tampons (and now also, menstrual cups) were considered Class II medical devices, and Pads Class I

  • Because tampons had already been sold on the market at the time of this classification, they were “grandfathered” in without performing safety testing. Companies were also welcome to establish “substantial equivalence” for new products, bypassing premarket approval processes

  • In the 1960’s tampon manufacturers started using semi/synthetic ingredients that were cheaper than cotton. These were able to bypass the preapproval process

  • In the 1970’s Procter & Gamble created an entirely synthetic tampon called Rely, which caused a deadly condition called Toxic Shock Syndrome (caused by the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus). In September 1980, Rely was withdrawn from the market

Pads

Pads are a menstrual collection device used to absorb blood flow. They are typically worn in the underwear.

Pros

  • Various absorbency levels

  • No risk of toxic shock syndrome

  • Users report less cramping than internal products

  • Some reusable options available, some organic disposable options available

Safety

  • Brands cannot be trusted to conduct their own safety profiles, even if they contain the label organic

  • Conventional bleaching methods are used in conventional pads and liners. Dioxins and furans are common byproducts of the bleaching process. They are linked to cancer, endocrine disruption, and reproductive toxicity.

  • Some pads emit toxic chemicals, including chemicals identified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Toxicology Program, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and the State of California Environmental Protection Agency as carcinogens, and reproductive and developmental toxins.

  • See this guide for a deeper breakdown of the chemicals contained within pads. Their study found that the highest concentration of phthalates detected were both found in organic pads.

  • This organization tested Always brand pads finding carcinogens and endocrine disrupting chemicals

Cons

  • Bulky and uncomfortable fit

  • Not biodegradable

  • Contain microplastics

  • Are often scented with undisclosed chemicals in the fibers

  • Costly over time (average: $168 per year)

  • Restrictive for certain activities

  • Safety issues

  • Polyacrylate Foam, Polypropylene, Polyethylene, Calcium Chloride, Ethylene/propylene copolymer, Hot Melt Adhesive, Styrene Block Copolymer, (Styrene Isoprene Co-Polyme), Vinyl acetate, Ethylene Hydrocarbon Resin, Napthenic oil, Thermoplastic adhesives, Acetate/ethylene/hydroxymethylacrylamide/ acrylamide copolymer, Styrene/butadiene copolymer, Tris (2,4-ditert-butylphenyl) phosphite , Methyl lactate, Synthetic beeswax, Potassium Polyoxyethyylene, Lauryl Ether Phosphate, Polyethylene Glycol Monolaurate, Glycerin, Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, Peg-15 cocoate, Peg-10 castor oil, Deceth-4 phosphate, Stearamide DEA, Diethylhexyl sodium sulfosuccinate, c12-14 sec-pareth-3, Peg-10 dimethicone, Peg-10 laurate, Peg-10 oleate, Polyoxyethylene lauryl ether, phosphate potassium salt, Laureth-10, Potassium octadecyl phosphate, Ceteareth-10, Ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, Polyoxyethylene monoallyl ether, Polyethylene glycol monolaurate, Ditallowethyl hydroxyethylmonium methosulfate, PEG- 11 Castor oil, Calcium Salts of Fatty Acids, Titanium Dioxide, Pigment Blue 15, Pigment Yellow 83, Pigment Red 48:2, Black 2, Pigment red 57:2, Pigment White 6, Pigment Violet 23, Pigment white 21, Solvent blue 104, Polyoxyalkylene substituted chromophore (blue), Pigment red 52:1 Lavandula Angustifolia Flower Oil Aloe barbadensis Leaf Juice, Rosa Damascena Flower Water, Houttuynia Cordata oil, Borneol, Menthol, Cornmint oil, Ethylene Brassylate, Triethyl Citrate, Extract of Chamomile, Petrolatum, Behenyl Alcohol, Aloe vera, Vitamin E

Tampons

A cylindrical shaped menstrual collection device made to absorb menstrual blood when inserted into the vaginal canal

Pros

  • More comfortable fit than pads

  • Useful for water activities

  • Comes in a variety of flow sizes

  • Sometimes preferred for athletics

  • Minimally obtrusive when wearing clothing

Cons

  • Sometimes difficult or uncomfortable to insert

  • May cause vaginal irritation, microbiome issues, and dryness

  • Have to change frequently

  • Not recommended for bedtime

  • Large environmental impact

  • Exposure to fragrances and other toxins through vaginal mucosa and lack of transparency

  • Safety issues and risk of TSS

Safety

  • Can lead to urinary tract infections and bacterial vaginosis

  • Most tampons contain very low levels of dioxin, a known carcinogen

  • They become less safe to use if you don’t change tampons after defecating

  • Using too large of a tampon for your flow can dry out the natural mucosa of the vaginal canal

  • Because tampons are considered medical devices, there’s no labeling requirement for ingredients

  • In one study 22% were found to have PFAS “forever chemicals” and some were organic brands

  • Tampon ingredient disclosure generally included only eight common ingredients: rayon, cotton, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, wax, fragrance, fiber finishes

  • More recent ingredient disclosures included: PEG Castor Oil, PEG Cocoate, Dialkyl sulfosuccinate, Glycerin, Ethoxylated Fatty Acid Esters, PEG-100 Stearate, Fatty Acid Polyglycol Ester, Plant Derived Oil, Cetearyl Alcohol, Oleyl Alcohol, Ceteareth-20, Ether & Ester based oil, Titanium Dioxide, Pigment White 6, C.I. Disperse Blue 60 (string), Disperse Yellow 235 (string) Dihexyl fumarate, Ethyl Undecylenate, Isobornyl Cyclohexanol, Phenoxy Ethyl Alcohol, Polysorbate 20, 4-tert-butylcyclohexyl acetate, alpha-isomethyl ionone, dipropylene glycol, ethylene brassylate, geraniol, hexyl cinnamal, isobutyl methyl tetrahydropyranol, limonene, linalool, methyl hydrogenated rosinate, methyldihydrojasmonate, pentadecalactone, tetramethyl acetyloctahydronaphthalenes (OTNE) Paraffin, Butyl Stearate, Carnauba Wax, Polymer Wax Dispersion

Cups

A U-shaped menstrual collection cup which is inserted in the vagina to collect blood flow

Pros

  • Lasts for about 10 years

  • Can be worn for many hours depending on flow

  • Minimal to no awareness once inserted properly

  • Produces less plastic waste

  • More ecological, contents can be composted

  • Cost effective

  • Can be boiled to sterilize

  • Healthier for vaginal canal

  • Sometimes preferred for athletics and travel

Safety

  • Less likely to contribute to yeast infections and bacterial vaginosis, according to some studies

  • Not recommended for everyone due to differences in anatomy, vaginal injuries, recently giving birth, or with conditions such as vaginismus or vulvodynia

  • Toxic Shock Syndrome risk is low but recent studies have confirmed it is still possible

  • Some evidence suggests that menstrual cups play a role in dislodging IUDs, however a study found no measurable difference comparing to other forms of internal menstrual products.

  • Almost all menstrual cups disclose just one ingredient: Medical grade silicone.

Cons

  • Insertion and removal can be difficult for some bodies

  • Sometimes cups exert pressure on the walls of the vaginal canal causing discomfort

  • Need to try different kinds to find the right fit, which can be costly

  • Can be prone to leakage

  • Cleaning the cup can be messy depending on the bathroom or facilities available

  • Organopolysiloxane mixture, Silicon Dioxide, Silicon Oil, Hydroxyl-terminated.

    Although many menstrual cups are colored, no dyes or colorants were ever disclosed for these products.

Discs

A menstrual collection device shaped as a shallow, circular disc that sits just below the cervix.to collect menstrual blood

Pros

  • Lasts for about 10 years

  • Can be worn for many hours depending on flow

  • Minimal to no awareness once inserted properly

  • Healthier for vaginal canal

  • Sometimes preferred for athletics and travel

  • Can be worn during insertion sex

  • Can be self-emptying (also known as “auto-dumping”) when the pelvic floor muscles contract while using the bathroom, causing the rim of the disc to momentarily move out of place and empty the disc.

Cons

  • May be reusable or disposable, which contributes to plastic waste

  • Costly

  • Insertion and removal can be difficult for some bodies

  • Sometimes discs exert pressure on the walls of the vaginal canal causing discomfort

  • Can be prone to leakage

  • Removing and cleaning the disc can be messy depending on the bathroom or facilities available

Safety

  • Menstrual discs are made from silicone or a combination of polymers of plastic and resins.

  • Not recommended for everyone due to differences in anatomy, vaginal injuries, recently giving birth, or with conditions such as vaginismus or vulvodynia

  • Menstrual discs largely disclose a single ingredient: Medical grade polymers. Other ingredients rarely disclosed included: Mineral oil Antioxidants, Natural carbon black

Absorbent Underwear and Clothing

Clothing that looks like typical underwear, but are designed to keep moisture away from your skin as they absorb menstrual blood

Pros

  • Lighter, more comfortable fit than pads

  • Can be worn for many hours

  • Useful for traveling and limited access to bathroom

  • Users report less cramping than internal products

  • Reusable

  • Cost Effective

  • Good for days leading up to or final days of menstruation when flow is low

Safety

  • In 2020, PFAS (chemicals with significant health impacts) were found in several brands of period underwear

  • Brands cannot be trusted to conduct their own safety profiles

  • See this guide for more brand information

  • The safest brands were The Period Company, Modibodi, Bambody, and Luna Pads

  • The worst brands were Thinx, Knix, Ruby Love, Saalt, and Sustain

  • Organic and non-toxic labels had no impact on the test results

  • Most period underwear products only disclosed ingredients on the product itself (in accordance with clothing labeling regulations), and not on the outer packaging as required by law. Ingredients commonly disclosed in period underwear included: Polyester, spandex, cotton, nylon

Cons

  • Requires washing and access to clean water and drying facilities

  • Can’t always handle very heavy flows

  • Limited brand choices

  • Safety issues

  • Polyamide Elastane Lyocell Truetex Lycra Xtra Life Fresh Fix Technology Agion HANSA SP 1050 Lava-XL-N Colorant Carbon Polyurethane

Free Bleeding

The practice of intentionally menstruating without blocking or collecting the menstrual flow

Pros

  • Some people experience less menstrual pain and less cramping than with insertion products

  • Less susceptible of infection

  • Environmentally friendly

  • Fights social stigma of menstrual concealment

  • Less exposure to undisclosed chemicals

  • Encourages menstruating in a comfortable environment

Safety

  • Can increase the risk of spreading blood-borne diseases if blood is left in shared spaces. Don’t leave blood for someone else to clean up, there are ecological ways of disposing of menstrual blood such as diluting in water and watering the soil, burying it, or washing it off.

Cons

  • Not practical for public or shared spaces

  • Blood stains clothing and sheets so menstrual specific items may make the process more comfortable

  • Requires frequent access to water hygiene

Menstrual Collection Choice Is Personal

  • You don’t need a menstrual product if you don’t want one

  • Only you will know the right menstrual product for your needs

  • Preferences vary, even among the same person

  • Most people will try multiple products in their life or combine multiple products

  • Cost is the most influential factor in menstrual product access

  • There are pros and cons to every method of collection

Menstrual Collection Choice Is Political

  • discrimination via non-availability in public spaces

  • discrimination via tampon tax

  • discrimination via being refused school/work leave or retaliation

  • discrimination via lack of regulation to safe menstrual products

  • discrimination via stigma in advertising

  • discrimination during incarceration or homelessness

  • discrimination via religion or culture

What Can We Do?

  1. Read ingredient listings on the product package and/or website.

  2. Look for products that do not contain plastics (ingredients like polyester, polypropylene, or polyethylene).

  3. If possible, select products that contain 100% cotton, without additional plastic layers.

  4. Look for products made with simpler and fewer ingredients

  5. Avoid fragranced products

  6. Avoid products with colorants

  7. Avoid products with additives like PEGs, which may be contaminated with ethylene oxide or 1,4 dioxane.

  8. Pay attention to any symptoms that occur during the use of a product – and try another brand for a month to see if it makes a difference.

  9. Use your voice to demand free, safer, and healthier products for ALL by engaging politically in a variety of ways

  10. Set up menstrual routines, rituals, and practices that encourage you to have the best, most relaxing, and rejuvenating menstruation possible, and this includes your products of choice, or none at all!